20 kVA vs 15 kVA · 208/120 V Three-Phase · Online Lithium UPS Modernization Comparison

Li90 20kVA vs Vertiv VM-Class (EXSV-15KTN)

This compares a 20 kVA Li90 against a 15 kVA Vertiv VM-Class, a deliberate upsize during modernization that adds capacity headroom at the same facility load. At a 15 kW load the 20 kVA Li90 runs near 75% with room to grow, while the 15 kVA Vertiv VM runs fully loaded. Both are online double-conversion; the Li90 adds lithium lifecycle, internal modular runtime, higher efficiency, and a much narrower, lighter cabinet.

Xtreme Power
Li90-20k
vs
Vertiv
VM-Class EXSV-15KTN (15 kVA)
Where the Li90-20k leads

What the Li90-20k brings

  • 20 kVA capacity vs 15 kVA – operational margin at the same load
  • LiFePO₄ batteries, up to 15-year design life
  • Higher online efficiency (94.5% vs 93.4%)
  • Internal modular runtime, no external cabinets required
  • Roughly half the cabinet width (12.6 vs 23.6 in)
  • Far lighter (483 lb vs over 1200)
Side-by-side

Side-by-side specifications

SpecificationXtreme Power Li90-20kVertiv VM-Class (EXSV-15KTN)Advantage / consideration
UPS architectureLithium-integrated compact standaloneCompact standalone three-phaseBoth compact standalone
Rated capacity20 kVA / 20 kW15 kVA / 15 kWLi90 – higher capacity (20 vs 15 kVA)
Loading at 15 kW facility load75%100%Li90 – operational margin
TopologyOnline double conversionOnline double conversionEquivalent protection
Battery technologyLithium iron phosphate (LFP)VRLA (lead-acid)Li90 – LFP lifecycle
Battery design lifeUp to 15 years3–5 years typicalLi90 – longer life
Internal runtime at 15 kW20 min (2 modules) / 30 min (3 modules)18 minLi90 – longer, scalable runtime
Runtime expansionInternal modular lithiumExternal cabinets typically requiredLi90 – internal modular expansion
Online efficiency94.5%93.4%Li90 – higher efficiency
Cabinet width12.6 in23.6 inLi90 – higher density (12.6 vs 23.6 in)
Installed weight483 lb>1200 lb (config dependent)Li90 – far lighter

Specifications based on publicly available manufacturer documentation; confirm against current vendor data. This is a 20 kVA vs 15 kVA modernization upsize, not a same-capacity comparison.

Where each fits

Choosing between them

As a modernization upsize, the Li90-20k adds capacity headroom and brings lithium lifecycle, internal modular runtime, higher efficiency, and a much smaller, lighter cabinet; the 15 kVA Vertiv VM-Class fits like-for-like VRLA capacity replacement. Topology is equivalent.

Choose the Li90-20k if you need

  • Capacity headroom during a 15 kVA replacement
  • Lithium iron phosphate lifecycle (up to 15-year design life)
  • Internal modular runtime without external cabinets
  • Higher efficiency and a much smaller, lighter cabinet

The Vertiv VM-Class may fit if you need

  • A like-for-like 15 kVA VRLA capacity replacement
  • An established VRLA platform / existing Vertiv standard
  • A conventional facility UPS replacement strategy
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Why compare a 20 kVA Li90 to a 15 kVA Vertiv?

This reflects a common modernization move: upsizing during replacement to add capacity headroom. At a 15 kW facility load the 20 kVA Li90 runs near 75% with margin for growth, while the 15 kVA Vertiv VM runs at 100%, fully loaded.

Does the Li90 run longer?

Yes, at the same 15 kW load: about 20 minutes on two battery modules or 30 on three, versus about 18 for the Vertiv VM. The Li90 scales runtime with internal lithium modules rather than external cabinets.

Which is more efficient?

The Li90, at up to 94.5% online versus 93.4% for the Vertiv VM, which also means less heat and lower cooling load.

What is the lithium-vs-VRLA lifecycle difference?

LFP batteries last far longer (up to 15 years vs roughly 3 to 8 for VRLA), tolerate higher temperatures, and cut replacement and maintenance over the system’s life. VRLA remains a lower up-front-cost, established option.

Evaluating a three-phase UPS modernization?

Xtreme Power supports lithium retrofit feasibility, runtime and load-growth modeling, electrical-room planning, and lifecycle cost analysis for three-phase facility modernization.