DC power architecture · 800 VDC and 50 VDC · AI racks

800 VDC and 50 VDC power for AI racks

Getting power into a dense AI data center rack comes down to one decision: convert once at the rack, or distribute at 800 VDC and step down where the load is. The right answer depends on rack density and how far the power has to travel. Xtreme Power Conversion builds the equipment for both routes, so the architecture decision does not have to be a vendor decision.

PRELIMINARY. The AX5, AX8 and DX8 platforms are not yet in production. Specifications are subject to change and agency listings are pending.
33 kW
AX5-33 · 1 OU ORv3
110 kW
AX8-110 · AC to 800 VDC
90 kW
DX8-90 · 1U at the rack
112 A
vs 1,800 A for the same 90 kW
Two routes

Two routes to 50 VDC at the rack

Both routes end at the same place: a regulated 50 VDC busbar feeding IT trays, where an intermediate bus converter takes it to 12 V for the CPUs and GPUs. They differ in where the AC to DC conversion happens, and therefore in how much current the run into the rack has to carry.

ROUTE 1 · DIRECT 50 VDCFACILITY AC346 to 480 VACAX5-33AC to 50 VDC · 33 kW1 OU ORv3IT LOAD50 VDCOne conversion stage.Simplest path to the rack.ROUTE 2 · 800 VDC DISTRIBUTIONFACILITY AC3-phase, 3W + GAX8-110AC to 800 VDC · 110 kW3U or 7U112 ADX8-90800 to 50 VDC · 90 kW1U at the rack1800 AIT LOAD50 VDCHigh current stays inside the rackSame 90 kW. At 50 VDC the run into the rack carries 1,800 A;at 800 VDC it carries 112 A. Conductor loss scales with the square of current.

Route 1 converts once, at the rack. Route 2 distributes at 800 VDC and converts at the rack, leaving the high-current path on a short busbar inside the cabinet.

Choosing a route

Which one fits the rack

Direct 50 VDC · ORv3

AX5-33

  • One conversion stage, AC straight to 50 VDC
  • OCP Open Rack v3 (ORv3) power shelf
  • 33 kW in 1 OU; four shelves to 132 kW per rack
  • AC or 180 to 400 VDC input on the same shelf
  • Optional 2 OU battery shelf for ride-through
  • Best where the rack is fed from nearby AC
800 VDC distribution · 19-inch

AX8-110 + DX8-90

  • 800 VDC on the run, 50 VDC at the rack
  • One sixteenth the current on the feed into the rack
  • 110 kW per shelf; integrated LFP ride-through option
  • Transients to 160% absorbed without waking the battery
  • Best at high density and facility-scale distribution
The platforms

Shelves

ModelRolePowerHeightInputOutputRedundancy
AX5-33AC to 50 VDC at the rack33 kW1 OU ORv3346 to 480 VAC 3-phase, or 180 to 400 VDC50 VDC33 / 27.5 / 16.5 kW
AX8-110AC to 800 VDC110 kW3U400 to 480 VAC 3-phase, dual input800 VDC110 / 92 / 55 kW
AX8E-110AC to 800 VDC with ride-through110 kW7U400 to 480 VAC 3-phase, dual input800 VDC110 / 92 / 55 kW
DX8-90800 VDC to 50 VDC at the rack90 kW1U750 to 850 VDC50 VDC90 / 75 / 45 kW
Battery shelfRide-through for the AX5-3333 kW2 OU ORv350 VDC50 VDC5.5 kW for 90 s or more; 4.0 kW for 240 s or more

AX8E-110 ride-through: 110 kW for 90 seconds or more, from four 27.5 kW LFP modules. Peak efficiency 97.5% on the AC stage and up to 98.5% on the DC to DC stage.

Power modules

PSU5-55AC to 50 VDC
5.5 kW
PSU5-80AC to 50 VDC
8 kW
PSU8-185AC to 800 VDC
18.5 kW
DX8-150800 to 50 VDC
15 kW
PSU4-300±400 VDC
30 kW
AI load behavior

Built for how AI racks actually draw power

AI racks swing from near idle to peak and back in milliseconds, thousands of times an hour. Those spiky GPU loads are what an ORv3 power shelf or an 800 VDC power shelf has to absorb. Conventional designs are typically validated only to a 100% step, and beyond nominal is where battery involvement begins. Every Xtreme Power module carries integrated bulk capacitance sized to absorb those steps within regulation: 120 J on the 5.5 kW ORv3 module, 1200 J on the 18.5 kW 800 VDC module.

The AX8-110 holds 160% for a 400 µs moving average and 136% for 50 ms, verified across 24 dynamic and pulse load profiles with the battery not triggered on any of them. Ride-through stays reserved for outages rather than being consumed by compute transients.

The measured results, profile by profile, are on the AI power transients page: what spiky GPU loads do to the power system, where the energy comes from, and what to ask a power vendor.
Why now

Current, not capability, is the limit

AI data center rack power is rising faster than the equipment feeding it, and the constraint is current rather than capability. Resistive loss scales with the square of current, so as racks pass 100 kW the copper needed to feed them at 50 VDC becomes the limiting factor in the design rather than the converters. Delivering 90 kW at 50 VDC puts 1,800 A on the run into the rack. The same power at 800 VDC is 112 A on ordinary cable, and the high-current path stays inside the rack on a short busbar.

Where that conversion happens is a design decision, not a fixed answer. It depends on rack density, how far the power travels, and what the facility already distributes.

On the roadmap

Higher-density ORv3 modules at 8 kW and 12 kW, taking a 1 OU shelf to 48 kW and 72 kW. A ±400 VDC platform for bipolar rack distribution, at module level today. Ask us where these fit your rack roadmap.

Product pages

The platforms in detail

AX5-33 33 kW 1 OU ORv3 power shelf, front viewDirect 50 VDC

AX5-33 →

  • 33 kW in 1 OU, six 5.5 kW modules
  • AC or 180 to 400 VDC input
  • OCP Open Rack v3 (ORv3) form factor, 1 OU shelf
AX8-110 110 kW AC to 800 VDC power shelf, front view800 VDC

AX8-110 → · DX8-90 →

  • AX8-110: 110 kW AC to 800 VDC, 3U, or 7U with LFP ride-through
  • DX8-90: 90 kW 800 to 50 VDC in 1U at the rack
  • Capacity added in 110 kW and 90 kW increments
FAQ

DC power architecture: common questions

Why distribute at 800 VDC instead of 50 VDC?

Current. Delivering 90 kW at 50 VDC puts 1,800 A on the run into the rack, which sets the copper size for the whole design. The same 90 kW at 800 VDC is 112 A on ordinary cable. Conductor loss scales with the square of current, so moving the conversion to the rack confines the high-current path to a short busbar inside the cabinet.

When is direct 50 VDC conversion the better choice?

Where the rack is fed from nearby AC and density is moderate. The AX5-33 converts once, AC straight to 50 VDC, in 1 OU of ORv3 space, and four shelves take a rack to 132 kW. Fewer conversion stages mean fewer things to power, monitor and service.

How much ride-through is available?

On the 800 VDC route, the AX8E-110 carries 110 kW for 90 seconds or more from four 27.5 kW LFP battery modules. On the ORv3 route, a 2 OU battery shelf supports 5.5 kW for 90 seconds or more, or 4.0 kW for 240 seconds or more.

Do AI load transients drain the battery?

Not in this design. Each power module carries integrated bulk capacitance, 1200 J on the 18.5 kW 800 VDC module and 120 J on the 5.5 kW ORv3 module, sized to absorb load steps within the regulation window. Across 24 dynamic and pulse load profiles the battery was never triggered, so ride-through is spent on loss of supply rather than on routine compute transients.

What redundancy arrangements are supported?

Modules within each shelf support N+0, N+1 and N+N, and shelves themselves can be deployed with a spare. The AX8-110 rates 110 / 92 / 55 kW across those arrangements, the DX8-90 rates 90 / 75 / 45 kW, and the AX5-33 rates 33 / 27.5 / 16.5 kW.

Plan the architecture before the racks arrive

Xtreme Power engineers can walk through rack density, feed distance and redundancy, and size either route against your load profile.

PRELIMINARY. Products described are not yet in production and specifications are subject to change. Agency listings are pending. Transient results are from factory dynamic load testing of the 18.5 kW 800 VDC power module to OCP Diablo 400 section 7.3.3 Tables 7 and 8, dated May 2026, cited as test method only and not as a claim of compliance with an OCP rack specification.