50–140 kVA · 480 V Three-Phase · Modular Facility UPS Frame Comparison

X90-2S vs Vertiv APM2

The Xtreme Power X90-2S and Vertiv APM2 are modular frame UPS platforms for data-center, industrial, imaging, and mission-critical facility power in the 30–120 kVA class. The X90-2S integrates modular power conversion, internal VRLA batteries, maintenance bypass, and the static switch in one frame, about 6 minutes of internal runtime at 100 kW; the APM2 is a modular frame typically deployed with external battery cabinets. These differences shape electrical-room footprint, runtime architecture, and installation scope.

Xtreme Power
X90-2S
vs
Vertiv
APM2 (30–120 kVA)
Where the X90-2S leads

What the X90-2S brings

  • Higher maximum frame capacity (140 vs 120 kVA)
  • Internal battery runtime for retrofit-constrained rooms (6 min at 100 kW)
  • Longer runtime per external cabinet (15–18 min vs 8.5 min)
  • Maintenance bypass and static switch integrated as standard
  • Fewer separate cabinets to plan and install
Side-by-side

Side-by-side specifications

SpecificationXtreme Power X90-2SVertiv APM2Engineering consideration
TopologyOnline double conversionOnline double conversionEquivalent protection
Voltage480 V three-phase480 V three-phaseEqual, 480 V 3-phase
Capacity range50–140 kVA30–120 kVAX90 – higher max capacity (140 vs 120 kVA)
Internal runtime6 min @ 100 kW1.5 min @ 90 kWX90 – real internal runtime
Runtime, 1 battery cabinet15 min @ 140 kW (18 min @ 120 kW)8.5 min @ 120 kWX90 – longer runtime per cabinet
Maintenance bypassIntegrated (standard)Internal optional / external commonX90 – integrated bypass standard
Static switchIntegrated in the power frameSeparate modular config commonIntegration approach differs
System integrationIntegrated modular frameModular frame systemX90 integrates more in one frame
Electrical footprint6.9 sq ft (UPS + batteries + bypass)6.6 sq ft (UPS frame only)Comparable; X90 figure includes batteries + bypass
Battery serviceabilityModular internal batteryModular battery architectureBoth modular battery service
Efficiency (online)Up to 96.5%Up to 96.5–97%Comparable; APM2 up to 97%
Output power factorUnity (1.0)Unity (1.0)Equal unity PF
Short-circuit withstand65 kAIC65 kAICEqual fault withstand

Specifications from Xtreme Power’s X90-2S vs Vertiv APM2 comparison; confirm against current vendor documentation. Footprint figures are not like-for-like: the X90-2S value includes internal batteries and bypass, the APM2 value is the UPS frame only.

Where each fits

Choosing between them

The X90-2S leads on maximum capacity, internal and per-cabinet runtime, and standard integration of bypass and static switch; the APM2 offers a slightly higher peak efficiency and a modular-system approach favored where external-battery flexibility is the priority. Online topology, unity power factor, and fault withstand are equivalent.

Choose the X90-2S if you need

  • Internal battery runtime in retrofit-constrained electrical rooms
  • Higher maximum frame capacity (to 140 kVA)
  • Integrated maintenance bypass and static switch as standard
  • Fewer system cabinets to plan, install, and service
  • Footprint optimization for facility modernization

The Vertiv APM2 may fit if you need

  • A modular-system approach built around external battery cabinets
  • The top-of-range efficiency edge in favorable load profiles
  • Alignment with an existing Vertiv infrastructure standard
Questions

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between the X90-2S and the Vertiv APM2?

Integration and internal runtime. The X90-2S combines modular power, internal VRLA batteries, maintenance bypass, and the static switch in one frame (about 6 minutes at 100 kW internally), while the APM2 typically relies on external battery cabinets with limited internal runtime. The X90-2S also reaches a higher maximum frame capacity (140 vs 120 kVA).

Is the APM2 more efficient?

Marginally, at the top of its range. The APM2 is rated up to 96.5 to 97% online versus the X90-2S’s up to 96.5%; actual efficiency depends on load profile and configuration. The difference is small relative to the runtime and integration gaps.

Which has a smaller footprint?

They are comparable, but the figures are not like-for-like. The X90-2S’s 6.9 sq ft includes its internal batteries and bypass; the APM2’s 6.6 sq ft is the UPS frame alone, before the external battery cabinets it needs for runtime. Counting everything the APM2 requires, the X90-2S is competitive on total electrical-room footprint.

Why does internal runtime matter in a retrofit?

Internal battery capability lets the X90-2S deploy in space-constrained electrical rooms without immediately adding external battery cabinets, which simplifies modernization of legacy installations. External runtime can still be scaled later with matching VRLA or lithium cabinets.

Planning a facility UPS modernization?

Xtreme Power supports electrical-room planning, runtime architecture, and design-in for data center, healthcare imaging, and industrial infrastructure.