30–120 kVA Modular Facility UPS Frame Comparison (480 V)
Evaluating integration depth, runtime architecture, and system deployment scope between modern modular UPS frame platforms is critical when planning facility power modernization or replacement of aging electrical-room infrastructure.
The Xtreme Power Conversion X90-2S represents an integrated modular frame UPS architecture combining modular power conversion, internal battery capability, maintenance bypass, and static switch functionality within a single high-density system enclosure.
The Vertiv APM2 (30–120 kVA frame class) represents a modular frame UPS system architecture typically deployed with external battery systems and optional system-level maintenance bypass configurations depending on project requirements.
Both platforms are commonly evaluated across data-center support environments, industrial infrastructure, imaging facilities, and mission-critical commercial deployments where uptime continuity and infrastructure modernization objectives are key engineering considerations.
Platform Architecture Context
The X90-2S provides internal VRLA battery capability supporting approximately 6 minutes runtime at 100 kW, enabling deployment in retrofit-constrained electrical rooms without immediate requirement for external battery cabinets.
Extended runtime can be achieved through matching external VRLA battery cabinets or external lithium battery systems.
The Vertiv APM2 frame architecture typically relies on external battery cabinets for runtime scaling, with limited internal runtime capability depending on configuration.
Integration differences influence electrical-room planning, system installation scope, and long-term infrastructure lifecycle strategy.
Platform Comparison Matrix
Modular UPS Frame Platforms (30–120 kVA Class)
| Feature | Xtreme Power X90-2S | Vertiv APM2 | Engineering Consideration |
| Capacity Range | 50–140 kVA | 30–120 kVA | Xtreme supports higher maximum frame capacity |
| Internal Runtime Capability | ~6 min @ 100 kW | ~1.5 min @ 90 kW | Internal runtime envelope impacts retrofit deployment flexibility |
| Runtime with 1 Battery Cabinet | ~15 min @ 140 kW (~18 min @ 120 kW) | ~8.5 min @ 120 kW | External battery scaling efficiency differs |
| System Integration Model | Integrated modular frame architecture | Modular frame UPS system architecture | Integration depth influences installation scope |
| Maintenance Bypass | Integrated (standard) | Internal optional / external common | Integration approach affects service workflow planning |
| Static Switch Architecture | Integrated within modular power structure | Separate modular static switch configuration common | System configuration flexibility differs |
| Electrical Footprint | ~6.9 sq ft (UPS + batteries + bypass) | ~6.6 sq ft (UPS frame only) | Comparable density; runtime integration differs |
| Battery Serviceability | Modular internal battery design | Modular battery architecture | Both support modular battery replacement workflows |
| Efficiency (Online Mode) | Up to 96.5 % | Up to 96.5–97 % | Efficiency varies by configuration and load profile |
| Output Power Factor | Unity (1.0 PF) | Unity (1.0 PF) | Both support full real power utilization |
| Short-Circuit Withstand | 65 kAIC | 65 kAIC | Equivalent fault withstand capability |
Electrical-Room Modernization Considerations
Modernization of legacy UPS installations often requires balancing:
• installation footprint constraints
• runtime integration requirements
• system deployment complexity
• infrastructure density objectives
• lifecycle service predictability
Integrated modular frame UPS platforms may support modernization strategies by reducing the number of required system cabinets and simplifying deployment planning compared to distributed modular system architectures.
Clinical & Imaging Infrastructure Context
UPS platforms in this capacity class are frequently evaluated in medical imaging environments including CT, MRI, and radiation therapy systems where transient load response, installation density, and predictable service access are critical engineering considerations.
Integrated runtime capability may support modernization initiatives in imaging facilities where electrical-room space constraints exist.
Typical Replacement Scenarios
Infrastructure planners may evaluate the X90-2S platform for:
• replacement of aging modular frame UPS systems
• modernization of facility UPS installations requiring footprint optimization
• deployment in retrofit-constrained electrical rooms
• infrastructure upgrades requiring simplified system integration
Platform Specification Context
| Parameter | Xtreme Power X90-2S | Vertiv APM2 (30–120 kVA) |
| Topology | Online double conversion | Online double conversion |
| Voltage | 480 V three-phase | 480 V three-phase |
| Internal Battery Capability | Yes | Limited / configuration dependent |
| External Battery Options | VRLA or lithium | VRLA or lithium |
| Maintenance Bypass | Integrated | Optional / system-level |
| Deployment Model | Integrated modular frame UPS | Modular frame UPS system |
Compare X90-2S with Other Modular UPS Platforms
- X90-2S vs Eaton 93PM
https://xpcc.com/x90-2s-vs-eaton-93pm/ - X90-2S vs Schneider Electric Galaxy VS
https://xpcc.com/x90-2s-vs-apc-galaxy-vs/ - X90-2S vs Vertiv EXM
https://xpcc.com/x90-2s-vs-vertiv-exm/
Engineering Planning Support
Phone: 800-582-4524
Email: sales@xpcc.com